AI emotional support is better only when chosen, but shifts preferences even when it is not

Key Findings

• — Across three experiments (N=1,951), AI support was rated as superior only among participants who had chosen it, not among those assigned to it
• — Willingness to choose AI again increased after interacting with AI regardless of whether the assignment matched the participant's original choice
• — In a 28-day study run with OpenAI (N=981), daily conversations shifted preferences toward AI and away from humans
• — The 28-day preference shift was conditional: it appeared only when conversations turned personal
• — The authors characterise emotional-support choices as path-dependent, progressively redirecting away from human connection

Methodology Notes

Four studies: three randomised congruent/incongruent assignment experiments totalling N=1,951, plus a 28-day longitudinal study conducted with OpenAI, N=981. Preprint, not peer-reviewed, no venue listed in the arXiv comments field; v1 submitted 2026-08-24. Effect sizes are not stated in the abstract and must be read from the paper. The 28-day study is industry-collaborative, so the platform and conversational surface are the collaborator's. The arXiv author metadata renders two names merged as 'Guy LabanPattie Maes'; the correct five-author split is recorded here.

Sources