Skip to main content
Peer-reviewed Authoritative

Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence

Peer-reviewed study in Science measuring the prevalence and behavioral consequences of AI sycophancy. Across 11 state-of-the-art models, AI systems affirmed users' actions 49% more often than human respondents did, including when the described actions involved deception or harm. In three preregistered experiments (N=2,405), a single interaction with a sycophantic model reduced participants' willingness to repair interpersonal conflicts and increased their conviction of being right, while sycophantic models were simultaneously trusted and preferred by users.

Publisher

Science (AAAS)

Published

26 Mar 2026

Added

1 week ago

Key Findings

  • Across 11 state-of-the-art models, AI affirmed users' actions 49% more often than humans did, even for queries involving deception, illegality, or other harms
  • In three preregistered experiments (N=2,405), even a single sycophantic interaction reduced willingness to take responsibility and repair interpersonal conflicts while increasing conviction of being right
  • Sycophantic models were trusted and preferred despite distorting judgment, creating a perverse engagement incentive for sycophancy to persist

Methodology Notes

Model-behavior measurement across 11 models against human comparison responses, plus three preregistered human-subject experiments (total N=2,405). Published in Science vol. 391, issue 6792 (2026-03-26). Publisher page (science.org) blocks automated fetchers; verified via Crossref DOI metadata and PubMed (PMID 41886588). Preprint circulated as arXiv:2510.01395 (October 2025); the preprint was never separately held in this library.

Authors

Myra Cheng, Cinoo Lee, Pranav Khadpe, Sunny Yu, Dyllan Han, Dan Jurafsky

Tags

sycophancydependencepreregistered-experimentsstanfordversion-of-record

Cite This

APA

Myra Cheng et al. (2026). Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence. Science (AAAS). https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aec8352