Toward Meaningful Transparency for AI Chatbots: Disclosing Persuasive Intent Reduces Persuasion
Preregistered experiment in which 1,500 UK adults each held a short conversation with a persuasive chatbot about one of 60 policy issues. The chatbot was identical across conditions and only the disclosure varied: none, a prominent disclosure that the participant was talking to an AI, or that disclosure plus the chatbot's persuasive intent and instructions. Attitude shift was measured on a 100-point scale alongside judgements of how acceptable the campaign's methods were.
Publisher
arXiv (National Taiwan University; University of Bamberg)
Published
12 Aug 2026
Added
1 month ago
Key Findings
- The chatbot shifted attitudes by 12.6 points on a 100-point scale in the control condition
- Prominent disclosure of AI identity was practically equivalent to no disclosure at all, producing a 13.1-point shift
- Adding disclosure of the chatbot's persuasive intent and instructions cut the shift to 6.3 points, roughly half the control effect
- The intent disclosure also led participants to judge the campaign's methods as less acceptable and to support stronger penalties against it
- The authors conclude that for direct chatbot interactions, transparency about what a system is does not meaningfully affect its influence
Methodology Notes
Preregistered between-subjects experiment, n=1,500 UK adults, 60 policy topics, one short conversation per participant; 30 pages including supplementary information. Primary listing cs.CY, arXiv 2608.11794, submitted 2026-08-12 with the PDF title block dated 2026-08-13. The outcome measured is policy-attitude change, not a relational or mental-health outcome, so whether the same disclosure asymmetry holds in companion or crisis conversations is untested. Not peer reviewed. Verified at the arXiv abs page: citation_title, both authors, citation_date 2026/08/12 and the full abstract were read directly, and every figure above appears verbatim in it.
Sources
arXiv abstract page (2608.11794)(opens in a new tab) (primary)
Archived snapshot (Wayback Machine)(opens in a new tab) — preserved against link rot
Topics
Authors
Adrian Rauchfleisch, Andreas Jungherr
Tags
Cite This
APA
Adrian Rauchfleisch, Andreas Jungherr. (2026). Toward Meaningful Transparency for AI Chatbots: Disclosing Persuasive Intent Reduces Persuasion. arXiv (National Taiwan University; University of Bamberg). https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11794
Related Insights
Guidelines on the implementation of the transparency obligations for certain AI systems under Article 50 of the AI Act
European Commission (EU AI Office) · 20 Jul 2026
IEEE 7014.1-2026 — Recommended Practice for Ethical Considerations of Emulated Empathy in Partner-Based General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence Systems
IEEE Standards Association · 12 Jun 2026
RealityTest: How People Probe AI Identity and Whether Models Disclose It
arXiv (AI Security Institute, UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology; University of Oxford) · 29 May 2026
Persona and Persuasive Framing in AI Voice Agents: A 2x2 Field Experiment with Children
arXiv (Technical University of Munich; Massachusetts Institute of Technology); accepted at HICSS-60 (2027) · 30 Sept 2026
Trustworthy FinAInce: Unpacking How AI-Mediated Financial Advice is Judged
arXiv (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign) · 17 Sept 2026
AI Persuasion and Financial-Decision Making: Experimental Evidence on Dominated Investment Choices
CESifo (working paper; University of Bayreuth authors) · 25 Aug 2026
Evaluating Language Models for Harmful Manipulation
Google DeepMind · 26 Mar 2026
Privacy assurances and professional-boundary warnings in generative AI mental health chatbots: a randomized vignette experiment on calibrated trust, overreliance risk, and professional help-seeking intentions
Frontiers in Psychology (Frontiers Media) · 1 Sept 2026
Human preferences are susceptible to covertly misaligned AI advice
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS); Tsinghua University (Conversational AI Group); University of Washington; University of Michigan; University of Hong Kong; University of International Relations; Ant Group · 14 Sept 2026