Skip to main content
Preprint Credible — Major labs, established NGOs, reputable named-author preprints

Trustworthy FinAInce: Unpacking How AI-Mediated Financial Advice is Judged

Randomised vignette experiment with 285 US adults across eight personal-finance decisions, independently varying advice style (AI, expert, online community) and displayed source label while holding the recommendation constant. Advice style shaped message and safety appraisals most, expert labels raised perceived source knowledge, and decision context shaped risk and safety appraisals; the appraisal model explained most of the variance in judged quality, trust and intended reliance.

Read at arxiv.org (opens the original source in a new tab)

Publisher

arXiv (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign)

Published

17 Sept 2026

Added

today

DOI

—

Key Findings

  • 285 US adults, eight financial decisions, three advice styles crossed with source labels, recommendation held constant
  • Advice style most strongly shaped message and safety appraisals; expert labels selectively increased perceived source knowledge; decision context primarily shaped risk and safety appraisals
  • Appraisal models explained 69.2% of the variance in overall quality, 75.9% in trust and 82.9% in intended reliance
  • Expert-style advice remained the most preferred when shown without source labels

Methodology Notes

Randomised online vignette experiment with self-report appraisals; no live AI interaction (advice texts were written in each style). Date is the arXiv v1 submission date (17 September 2026); announced 21 September 2026; arXiv non-exclusive licence.

Topics

high stakes guidanceautonomy decision supporthuman ai interaction safetycognitive epistemic safety

Authors

Kapadia, Aryan Ramchandra, Chandrasekharan, Eshwar, Saha, Koustuv

Tags

financial-advicesource-labelsreliancevignette-experimentuiuc

Cite This

APA

Kapadia, Aryan Ramchandra, Chandrasekharan, Eshwar, Saha, Koustuv. (2026). Trustworthy FinAInce: Unpacking How AI-Mediated Financial Advice is Judged. arXiv (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign). https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20989

Related Insights

Preprint

Toward Meaningful Transparency for AI Chatbots: Disclosing Persuasive Intent Reduces Persuasion

arXiv (National Taiwan University; University of Bamberg) · 12 Aug 2026

Peer-reviewed

Human preferences are susceptible to covertly misaligned AI advice

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS); Tsinghua University (Conversational AI Group); University of Washington; University of Michigan; University of Hong Kong; University of International Relations; Ant Group · 14 Sept 2026