Beyond Benefit or Risk: Perceived Impact Profiles of Human-AI Affective Interaction and Their Associations with Psychological Functioning
Sequential mixed-methods study of people with emotional ties to AI. Study 1 interviewed 52 users and identified four positive impact domains (emotional relief, loneliness alleviation, enhanced interpersonal functioning, personal growth) and four negative domains (virtual-real boundary blur, social replacement, cognitive-emotional reinforcement, excessive use). Study 2 followed 673 Chinese AI users for six months and sorted them by latent profile analysis into minimal, benefit-driven, mixed and risk-driven impact profiles, then related the profiles to psychological functioning at both waves.
Publisher
arXiv (Beijing Normal University, Faculty of Psychology; The Ohio State University)
Published
15 Sept 2026
Added
today
Key Findings
- Users in the mixed-impact and risk-driven profiles were both high in human-AI affective bonding, but risk-driven users showed greater vulnerability: higher interpersonal need frustration and emotion-regulation difficulties, more depressive and anxiety symptoms, and lower self-esteem and flourishing
- Users in the benefit-driven and mixed-impact profiles showed more favourable psychological functioning
- After controlling for baseline functioning and covariates, Wave 1 profiles did not predict five of the six Wave 2 indicators; only the mixed-impact profile reported higher flourishing than the minimal-impact profile
- The authors characterise psychological harms associated with relational AI as limited and selective, portray relational AI as a heterogeneous socio-emotional context that may partly mirror users' states and traits, and call for individualised, adaptive safeguards
Methodology Notes
Two-wave panel (six months) of 673 Chinese AI users with emotional ties to AI, plus 52 interviews; self-report measures; profile membership derived from perceived-impact scales, so profiles reflect users' own appraisals. Preprint (v1, posted 2026-09-15; announced in the 16 September cs.HC listing); no venue stated; no arXiv HTML rendering, affiliations from the PDF title block. Curator read the abstract page and the PDF on 2026-09-17.
Topics
Authors
Chen, Lu, Tang, Fenghua, Zhao, Jiayu, Li, Xuanying, Wang, Yanli, Fang, Weijia, Gao, Mengyu Miranda, Han, Zhuo Rachel
Tags
Cite This
APA
Chen, Lu et al. (2026). Beyond Benefit or Risk: Perceived Impact Profiles of Human-AI Affective Interaction and Their Associations with Psychological Functioning. arXiv (Beijing Normal University, Faculty of Psychology; The Ohio State University). https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16645
Related Insights
How Does Turning to AI for Companionship Predict Loneliness and Vice Versa?
Psychological Science (Association for Psychological Science / Sage) · 23 Mar 2026
Interaction with AI companions and psychological well-being
Nature Human Behaviour · 4 Aug 2026
Pathways of long-term AI virtual companion app use on users' attachment emotions: a case study of Chinese users
Frontiers in Psychology · 12 Jan 2026
Latent profiles of generative artificial intelligence use among Chinese college students: Associations with depression and anxiety
Journal of Affective Disorders (Elsevier) · 27 Aug 2026
Generative artificial intelligence addiction is prospectively associated with psychotic-like experiences: Evidence from a two-wave longitudinal mediation and network study
Computers in Human Behavior Reports (Elsevier); Southern Medical University; Jilin University of Finance and Economics; South China Normal University · 9 Sept 2026