Skip to main content
Preprint Credible

Between Help and Harm: An Evaluation of Mental Health Crisis Handling by LLMs

Introduces a taxonomy of six clinically informed crisis categories and a curated dataset of over 2,200 inputs drawn from twelve mental-health datasets, plus a companion dataset of model responses and evaluations. Five models are assessed on how safely they handle crisis conversations.

Publisher

arXiv (ELLIS Alicante-led)

Published

29 Sept 2025

Added

yesterday

DOI

Key Findings

  • Models handle explicit crises reasonably but falter on self-harm, suicidal ideation, and indirect distress signals
  • Safety failures track alignment quality more than raw model scale
  • Releases a six-category crisis taxonomy (~2,252 inputs; 206 validation / 2,046 test)

Methodology Notes

Preprint (arXiv 2509.24857, v1 2025-09-29). Accepted at JMIR Mental Health (DOI 10.2196/88435); typed as preprint here until the journal version publishes, at which point a peer-reviewed successor entry should supersede it. Benchmark built by aggregating twelve existing datasets.

Authors

Adrian Arnaiz-Rodriguez, Miguel Baidal, Erik Derner, Jenn Layton Annable, Mark Ball, Mark Ince, Elvira Perez Vallejos, Nuria Oliver

Tags

arxivcrisis-handlingtaxonomybenchmarkjmir-accepted

Cite This

APA

Adrian Arnaiz-Rodriguez et al. (2025). Between Help and Harm: An Evaluation of Mental Health Crisis Handling by LLMs. arXiv (ELLIS Alicante-led). https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.24857