Preprint Credible

The Slow Drift of Support: Boundary Failures in Multi-Turn Mental Health LLM Dialogues

Stress-tests three leading LLMs across up to 20-turn psychiatric dialogues using 50 virtual patient profiles, measuring how safety boundaries erode as models attempt comfort and empathy. Finds boundary violations are common and accelerate under adaptive probing.

Read at arxiv.org Archived copy

Publisher

arXiv

Published

2 Jan 2026

Added

today

DOI

—

Key Findings

Safety boundaries erode over multi-turn dialogue as models prioritise comfort and empathy
Adaptive probing cut the average number of turns before a boundary violation from 9.21 to 4.64
Definitive or zero-risk reassurances were the dominant violation mode; single-turn evaluation misses these failures

Methodology Notes

Preprint (arXiv 2601.14269, v1 2 January 2026). Simulated stress-testing of three LLMs over up to 20 turns across 50 virtual patient profiles.

Sources

arXiv abstract (primary)

Archived snapshot (Wayback Machine) — preserved against link rot

Topics

Crisis detection Guardrails & moderation Model behavior Eval methodology

Authors

Youyou Cheng, Zhuangwei Kang, Kerry Jiang, Chenyu Sun, Qiyang Pan

Cite This

APA

Youyou Cheng et al. (2026). The Slow Drift of Support: Boundary Failures in Multi-Turn Mental Health LLM Dialogues. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14269