Do Personal AI Conversations Reduce Loneliness? Evidence from a Pre-Registered Experiment
Pre-registered randomized experiment in which 7,286 French adults from an online panel were assigned either to hold at least one personal conversation a day with a generative AI tool of their choice for 28 days, on topics such as their day, feelings, goals or concerns, or to continue as usual. Treatment raised socio-emotional AI use substantially and increased subjective loneliness; life satisfaction, happiness, depression and objective isolation all moved in an adverse direction but were imprecisely estimated.
Publisher
Paris School of Economics (PSE Working Paper 2026-23, via HAL); Université Paris Dauphine-PSL; University College London
Published
2 Oct 2026
Added
3 days ago
Key Findings
- Treated participants increased the number of days with a personal AI conversation by about 5 (first-stage coefficient 4.77 with the pre-specified missing-value indicator; 5.16 on complete cases); a broad AI-use index rose by 0.43 SD and its socio-emotional subscale by 0.46 SD.
- Assignment to daily personal AI conversation increased single-item loneliness by 0.163 points on a 0-10 scale (0.056 SD; control mean 3.47; Romano-Wolf p = 0.001).
- UCLA-3 loneliness (+0.025 SD), life satisfaction (-0.029 SD), happiness (-0.013 SD) and depression (+0.029 SD) all moved in the adverse direction but were not statistically significant (Romano-Wolf p 0.344-0.495).
- Pre-specified heterogeneity analysis gave larger point estimates for respondents with a partner; exploratory analysis suggested adverse effects concentrated among respondents in smaller urban units.
- The authors read the pattern as consistent with substitution, rumination and AI validating grievances, and contrast it with single-session and purpose-built-companion studies that found loneliness reductions.
Methodology Notes
Individual-level randomized controlled trial pre-registered on the AEA RCT Registry (AEARCTR-0016749). Adults resident in France recruited from the Bilendi online panel; baseline wave 5-19 January 2026, intervention 22 January to 18 February, endline 19-28 February (a later cohort recruited through a second partner followed a three-week-delayed schedule and added 106 participants). Analysis sample 7,286 (3,642 control, 3,644 treatment) who passed the baseline attention check and completed both waves; endline completion 74.8% vs 74.7%. ANCOVA intention-to-treat estimates with baseline outcome and pre-specified covariates, Romano-Wolf correction within outcome families, Lee bounds for attrition. Compliance self-reported at endline; the sample is older, more educated and more often partnered than the French population. Working paper, not peer-reviewed. Dates: HAL version 2 released 2026-10-02 (working paper dated October 2026); SSRN posting 2026-10-17. Verification: the HAL PDF is behind an Anubis bot challenge and SSRN behind Cloudflare; the full 30-page PDF was read from a Wayback Save Page Now capture made 2026-10-19 (20261019020413); abstract matched via the HAL API and Crossref.
Sources
HAL record (PSE Working Paper 2026-23, v2)(opens in a new tab) (primary)
SSRN posting(opens in a new tab) (17 Oct 2026)
RePEc/IDEAS record(opens in a new tab)
Archived snapshot (Wayback Machine)(opens in a new tab) — preserved against link rot
Topics
Authors
Louis Fréget, Ariell Reshef, Claudia Senik
Tags
Cite This
APA
Louis Fréget, Ariell Reshef, Claudia Senik. (2026). Do Personal AI Conversations Reduce Loneliness? Evidence from a Pre-Registered Experiment. Paris School of Economics (PSE Working Paper 2026-23, via HAL); Université Paris Dauphine-PSL; University College London. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-05705909