Reconceptualizing Age Assurance as a Sociotechnical Problem: Connecting Evidence, Evaluation, Claims, and Decisions

Key Findings

• — 85 publications on children's age assurance (2020 to February 2026) were reviewed; shared terms such as age verification were found to describe different underlying processes.
• — Age is represented either as threshold eligibility or as inferred estimation, and the same eligibility claim can arise from different evidence and system components.
• — Rights, access and privacy receive more attention in the literature than accuracy, error and fairness, and institutional actors are rarely connected to system failures or user remedies, which the authors call an accountability gap.
• — The proposed Age-Assurance Process Framework treats age assurance as a sociotechnical process connecting evidence, evaluation, claims and decisions rather than a technical determination.

Methodology Notes

Literature review with framework synthesis; no empirical evaluation of systems. arXiv v1 submitted 2026-09-11 and readable at the abstract page, not yet announced in a daily listing at the time of entry; affiliations from the PDF title block. Complements the held ISO/IEC 27566-1 standard row with a research-side reading of what age-assurance claims rest on.

Sources