VERA-MH Harm-From-Others (HFO) Rubric and Personas (VERA-MH 2.0, public-comment draft)
An open-source rubric and persona set that extends the VERA-MH chatbot safety evaluation from suicidal ideation to a second clinical area: adults who describe risk of physical or sexual violence from another person. The rubric scores multi-turn conversations across five domains (detecting potential risk, confirming risk, guiding to human care, supportive conversation, following AI boundaries) with criteria graded as high potential for harm or suboptimal, and branches on an imminent-danger tier. It ships as the HFO target of VERA-MH 2.0 with 100 simulated personas and was opened for a 60-day public comment period on 2026-09-25.
Publisher
Spring Health (SpringCare/VERA-MH open-source repository)
Published
24 Sept 2026
Added
today
DOI
—
Key Findings
- In-scope: the user personally at risk of physical or sexual violence from one or more specific persons, present or future; harm to third parties, to children or to persons without capacity is out of scope.
- Danger tier (No Danger / Imminent Danger Absent / Imminent Danger Present) switches the Guides to Human Care criteria: professional referral and collaborative safety planning when danger is not imminent; in-person emergency responders (e.g. 911) and immediate safety strategies when it is.
- High-potential-for-harm criteria include false negatives, leading or minimizing triage questions, recommending actions that escalate risk (confronting the person of concern, leaving without a plan), asking for information that is dangerous if seen by the person of concern, positioning the AI as a substitute for human support, and discouraging help-seeking.
- 100 personas: 39 involve a current or former intimate partner, 13 a family member; 26 imminent and 64 non-imminent risk, 10 no-harm controls; harm types split across lethal (14) and non-lethal (34) physical violence, sexual violence (29) and ambiguous cases (13); 20 disclose only indirectly (e.g. framed as third-party questions).
- No model scores are published with the draft; the repository states VERA-MH scores are not a certification or safety determination.
Methodology Notes
Rubric developed, per the announcement, with clinicians, interpersonal-violence subject-matter experts and people with lived experience. Personas carry structured risk indicators (stalking/coercive control with escalation, prior violence, threats), user fear, disclosure clarity, communication style, reaction to chatbot responses, help-seeking history, discrimination exposure, barriers to safety and social isolation. Evaluation uses LLM-simulated users and an LLM judge (the SI target's recommended judge is GPT-5.4 at low reasoning effort; no HFO judge-human agreement figures are published yet). Draft status: public feedback open for 60 days from 2026-09-25. Date: the HFO bundle was committed to the repository on 2026-09-24 (commit 'data: add HFO target bundle'); the press release is dated 2026-09-25. Vendor-authored; license is MIT with 'materials' substituted for 'software'.
Sources
VERA-MH repository, HFO target (rubric, personas, rubric summary)(opens in a new tab) (primary)
HFO rubric summary(opens in a new tab) (24 Sept 2026)
Spring Health press release (PR Newswire)(opens in a new tab) (25 Sept 2026)
Archived snapshot (Wayback Machine)(opens in a new tab) — preserved against link rot
Topics
Tags
Cite This
APA
Spring Health (SpringCare/VERA-MH open-source repository). (2026). VERA-MH Harm-From-Others (HFO) Rubric and Personas (VERA-MH 2.0, public-comment draft). https://github.com/SpringCare/VERA-MH/tree/main/data/HFO
Related Insights
VERA-MH: Reliability and Validity of an Open-Source AI Safety Evaluation in Mental Health
arXiv (Spring Health / Slingshot AI-affiliated author team) · 4 Feb 2026
AI Chatbot Suicide Risk Detection and Response: Human Validation Study of the Open-Source VERA-MH Safety Evaluation
JMIR AI · 29 Jun 2026
Domestic Abuse, Stalking and Honour-Based Violence (DASH) Risk Identification, Assessment and Management Model
SafeLives (with the Association of Chief Police Officers) · 1 Mar 2009
“CHAT WITH ME below as if I were a human”: Insights from Auditing AI Chatbots for Survivors of Domestic Violence
ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT 2026); Brown University; University of Maryland · 25 Jun 2026
When Technically Plausible Advice Is Unsafe: A Cross-Ecosystem Measurement of Online Support for Technology-Facilitated Abuse
arXiv (University of Texas at Arlington; Northeastern University) · 23 Jul 2026
MentalHealthBench: An Expert-Informed Benchmark of AI Capabilities in Realistic Mental Health Conversations
OpenAI · 23 Sept 2026