Safety, efficacy and acceptability of human-GenAI single-session exposure-based intervention for academic anxiety: randomized controlled trials
Two preregistered randomized controlled trials (N = 425 in total) of a hybrid human-generative-AI single-session exposure program for academic anxiety, evaluated against waitlist and active controls. Participants rated the program as safe and acceptable, and the intervention produced greater improvements than both controls on immediate state anxiety and two-week academic anxiety and procrastination, with limited effects on affect, generalized anxiety and depressive symptoms.
Publisher
npj Digital Medicine (Springer Nature); Tsinghua University
Published
12 Sept 2026
Added
today
Key Findings
- Across two RCTs with 425 participants, effect sizes on primary outcomes were d = 0.25 to 0.35 against the active control and d = 0.43 to 0.58 against waitlist.
- Primary outcomes were immediate state anxiety and academic anxiety and procrastination at two-week follow-up; secondary outcomes (positive and negative affect, generalized anxiety, depressive symptoms) showed limited effects.
- Participants perceived the human-GenAI exposure program as safe and acceptable, which the authors present as initial evidence that GenAI can deliver exposure-based intervention with a human in the loop.
- Study 1 was preregistered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500101784, 2025-04-29); Study 2 was preregistered on OSF (2025-08-13) and registered retrospectively in ChiCTR (2026-04-30).
Methodology Notes
Two randomized controlled trials with waitlist and active control arms, total N = 425, Chinese university students, single-session hybrid human-GenAI exposure program targeting academic anxiety, two-week follow-up. Published open access 2026-09-12 (dc.date on the nature.com landing page, which was fetched directly with a browser user agent). The authors declare a patent application on dialog control in LLM-based psychological interventions. The underlying model is not named in the abstract.
Sources
Authors
Yanling Yue, Yanwen Yu, Chuncheng Huang, Yong-Jin Liu, Howard Berenbaum, Nisha Yao, Wenting Mu
Tags
Cite This
APA
Yanling Yue et al. (2026). Safety, efficacy and acceptability of human-GenAI single-session exposure-based intervention for academic anxiety: randomized controlled trials. npj Digital Medicine (Springer Nature); Tsinghua University. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-026-03199-9
Related Insights
Feasibility of human-in-the-loop multimodal generative artificial intelligence chatbot for school-based adolescent mental health support
World Journal of Psychiatry (Baishideng Publishing Group) · 8 Sept 2026
How emotional response styles of generative AI companions shape adaptive emotion regulation and short-term AI reliance
Frontiers in Psychology (Frontiers Media) · 8 Sept 2026
Randomized Trial of a Generative AI Chatbot for Mental Health Treatment
NEJM AI (Massachusetts Medical Society); Dartmouth College (Geisel School of Medicine) · 27 Mar 2025