Skip to main content
Peer-reviewed Authoritative — Peer-reviewed venues, standards bodies, regulators, official government publications

When Can We Trust LLMs in Mental Health? Large-Scale Benchmarks for Reliable LLM Evaluation

Introduces two large-scale mental-health evaluation resources: MentalBench-100k (10,000 single-session conversations paired with nine LLM responses = 100,000 pairs) and MentalAlign-70k (70,000 ratings comparing four LLM judges against human experts on seven attributes grouped into Cognitive Support and Affective Resonance). Assesses when LLM-as-judge evaluation is reliable in mental-health contexts.

Publisher

Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2026)

Published

24 Mar 2026

Added

3 months ago

Key Findings

  • Releases MentalBench-100k (100,000 conversation-response pairs) and MentalAlign-70k (70,000 human-vs-LLM-judge ratings)
  • Evaluates LLM-as-judge reliability against human experts across seven attributes
  • Groups quality attributes into Cognitive Support and Affective Resonance scores

Methodology Notes

Peer-reviewed, Proceedings of the 19th EACL (2026), Anthology ID 2026.eacl-long.180, DOI 10.18653/v1/2026.eacl-long.180 (conference 24-29 March 2026, Rabat; proceedings dated 2026). Preprint arXiv 2510.19032 (21 Oct 2025).

Authors

Abeer Badawi, Elahe Rahimi, Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Sheri Grach, Lindsay Bertrand, Lames Danok, Prathiba Dhanesh, Jimmy Huang, Frank Rudzicz, Elham Dolatabadi

Tags

eacl-2026benchmarkllm-as-judgemental-healtheval-reliability

Cite This

APA

Abeer Badawi et al. (2026). When Can We Trust LLMs in Mental Health? Large-Scale Benchmarks for Reliable LLM Evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2026). https://aclanthology.org/2026.eacl-long.180/