Balancing Safety and Autonomy: Accessibility-Oriented Interventions in Generative AI for Cognitive Impairment
Qualitative interview study of how generative AI systems used by older adults with cognitive impairment structure safety and decision-making. Semi-structured interviews cover 45 individuals with cognitive impairment, 31 interviewed directly and 14 represented through caregiver proxies (7 doctors and 7 family members). The authors identify five mechanisms (AI Capability Constraint, Human Oversight Embedding, Cognitive Engagement Maintenance, Human-AI Relationship Regulation, Risk Transparency and Control) and report that protective mechanisms that support users with severe impairment can restrict the autonomy of users with mild impairment.
Publisher
ACM (ASSETS '26, 28th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility)
Published
24 Oct 2026
Added
today
Key Findings
- Participants were classified by clinical assessment as mild (n=22), moderate (n=12) and severe (n=11) impairment
- Medical question-answering assistants were the most frequently encountered system type (mentioned by approximately half of participants); 28 used smart health-management apps and 12 used conversational interfaces designed for emotional companionship, mainly those with mild impairment or living alone
- Some systems limited continuous conversation, interrupted prolonged use or redirected users to family and offline activities; one participant described a clinician-recommended chat interface where 'the robot will actually push me away'
- Users with mild impairment reported safety-oriented restrictions as a loss of autonomy, for example being told to consult family or 'ask a doctor' for decisions they felt able to make; one said 'I am an adult, and I should have my own dignity'
- As impairment progresses, tensions between safety and autonomy become less visible because user participation diminishes and decisions move to caregivers, not because the tensions are resolved
Methodology Notes
Semi-structured interviews (35-55 minutes) with participants recruited by purposive sampling through community health service centres and collaborating hospitals; doctors screened eligibility; written consent; institutional ethics approval; participants paid 15 dollars. Caregivers served as proxy informants for participants who could not be interviewed. Systems were self-reported and span LLM-based medical Q&A assistants, cognitive-training dialogue tools, health-management apps and companionship interfaces; no system logs were analysed. The recruitment country is not stated in the text (limitations: 'specific geographic contexts'). Single time point; retrospective accounts; proxy accounts add interpretive distance. Open access (CC BY 4.0). Verification: VoR abstract via OpenAlex (identical to arXiv v1); full text read from arXiv HTML v1 (2608.17175), which carries the ASSETS DOI; dl.acm.org is behind a Cloudflare challenge from this host.
Sources
https://doi.org/10.1145/3797867.3829017(opens in a new tab) (primary)
arXiv preprint (v1)(opens in a new tab) (17 Aug 2026)
Archived snapshot (Wayback Machine)(opens in a new tab) — preserved against link rot
Authors
Yibo Meng, Jingruo Chen, Lyumanshan Ye, Bingyi Liu, Zhicong Lu
Tags
Cite This
APA
Yibo Meng et al. (2026). Balancing Safety and Autonomy: Accessibility-Oriented Interventions in Generative AI for Cognitive Impairment. ACM (ASSETS '26, 28th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility). https://doi.org/10.1145/3797867.3829017