What Parents Can See: Divergent Accounts of Youth AI Companion Use in Parenting and Teenager Subreddits

Key Findings

• — Emotional support from AI companions is discussed in 31% of teenager posts versus 19% of parenting posts; romantic or sexual interaction in 25% of teenager posts versus 36% of parenting posts
• — Attachment and dependence is the risk teenagers raise most often (19% of teenager posts), close to the parental rate (16%)
• — Emotional support as a benefit appears in 27% of teenager posts but 5% of parenting posts; parental co-use is nearly absent (3%)
• — The authors' explanation: hours-long nightly sessions surface to parents as dependence and sexual content surfaces when a parent reads the log, while venting about an everyday problem looks like any other conversation and is the use parents most often miss
• — Human inter-annotator agreement before adjudication was Cohen's kappa 0.773; agreement between the language model and adjudicated labels ranged from kappa 0.58 to 0.94 across codes, with mean pairwise agreement across three model runs of kappa 0.929

Methodology Notes

Reddit posts from 2023 to 2026 retained by a language-model relevance filter from 1,548,336 candidate posts; final corpus 1,628 posts (teenager subreddits: r/teenagers 1,376 and r/TeenagersButBetter 113; parenting subreddits: r/Parenting 76, r/daddit 23, r/Mommit 17, r/Parents 12, r/parentingteenagers 7, r/raisingkids 4). Codebook developed inductively and deductively (starting from published use categories) and applied by GPT-5.4; seven of twenty codes appear in fewer than five posts and agreement is not reported for them. The parenting side is small (139 posts), posts are self-selected public accounts, and excerpts are paraphrased. Code at github.com/tberkane/what-parents-can-see. Date is the arXiv v1 submission date (17 September 2026); announced 21 September 2026; arXiv non-exclusive licence.

Sources