Psychological Influences of Conversational AI: Research and Design Directions for Reducing Harm and Promoting Well-Being
Framework preprint examining how conversational AI systems affect users' psychological health, identifying benefits (information access, learning support) alongside risks including emotional entanglement, unhealthy dependence, and amplification of psychological vulnerabilities. Proposes design guidelines for general-purpose AI systems to minimize psychological harm and promote well-being across standard interactions, role-playing, and support-oriented contexts, framing the recommendations as testable hypotheses for empirical study.
Publisher
arXiv preprint
Published
27 Jul 2026
Added
1 week ago
DOI
—
Key Findings
- Names emotional entanglement, unhealthy dependence, and amplification of psychological vulnerabilities as core psychological risk classes of general-purpose conversational AI
- Distinguishes three interaction contexts with different risk profiles: standard interactions, role-playing, and support-oriented use
- Proposes harm-reduction and well-being design directions framed explicitly as testable hypotheses rather than settled guidance
Methodology Notes
arXiv:2607.25057 (cs.AI, cs.CY, cs.HC), v1 submitted 2026-07-27. Author affiliations are not stated on the arXiv listing; the author team spans industry research and academic psychology (includes James W. Pennebaker and Eric Horvitz). Position/framework paper: design directions synthesized from literature, not a new empirical study.
Sources
arXiv abstract page (primary)
Archived snapshot (Wayback Machine) — preserved against link rot
Authors
Jina Suh, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Forough Poursabzi-Sangdeh, Emily Tseng, Eugenia Kim, Luke Nicholls, James W. Pennebaker, Eric Horvitz
Tags
Cite This
APA
Jina Suh et al. (2026). Psychological Influences of Conversational AI: Research and Design Directions for Reducing Harm and Promoting Well-Being. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25057