Exploring K-12 Teachers' Perceptions of Students' Relationships with AI Companions: Boundaries, Intervention Strategies, and Design Implications

Key Findings

• — 33 US K-12 teachers were interviewed with scenarios; they distinguished academic companions, which they welcomed, from intimate companions, which they feared remove the developmental friction of learning to sustain human relationships.
• — Teachers bounded their jurisdiction by setting and observable wellbeing: within it they taught, talked and watched; beyond it they saw themselves as the adults best placed to notice trouble and connect students to support.
• — Teachers envisioned AI companion literacy as shared work across counsellors, parents, platforms and policymakers, spiralling across grade levels.
• — The paper proposes AI companion literacy as an extension of AI literacy, which existing frameworks treat as tool use rather than relationship.

Methodology Notes

Qualitative scenario-based interview study, N = 33 US K-12 teachers, 17 pages; affiliations from the PDF title block (Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Chicago). arXiv v1 submitted 2026-09-11 and readable at the abstract page, not yet announced in a daily listing at the time of entry. Same CMU group as the addictive-intimacy disengagement study posted the same day.

Sources