The Governance of Intimacy: A Preliminary Policy Analysis of Romantic AI Platforms
A preliminary policy analysis comparing the privacy-policy and consent practices of six romantic/companion AI platforms across the GDPR, CCPA, and China's PIPL regimes, focused on the collection and retention of the intimate data users disclose in romantic or sexual exchanges.
Publisher
arXiv (King's College London-affiliated author team)
Published
25 Feb 2026
Added
1 week ago
DOI
—
Key Findings
- Analyses six romantic AI platforms — including Grok, Nomi, Replika, and three Chinese platforms — across three privacy regimes.
- Flags that privacy scholarship has focused on traditional personal data rather than emotionally sensitive conversational content.
- Surfaces gaps in consent and data-retention practices for intimate disclosures across jurisdictions.
Methodology Notes
Preprint (arXiv 2602.22000; v1 2026-02-25). Method: privacy-policy and terms-of-service analysis of six romantic AI companion platforms under GDPR, CCPA, and PIPL. Title, authors, and date verified via the arXiv abstract page and API. Not yet peer-reviewed. Cross-jurisdictional coverage includes Chinese platforms (MaoXiangAI, ZhuMengDAO, XingYeAI).
Sources
arXiv preprint (primary)
Archived snapshot (Wayback Machine) — preserved against link rot
Authors
Xiao Zhan, Yifan Xu, Rongjun Ma, Shijing He, Jose Luis Martin-Navarro, Jose Such
Tags
Cite This
APA
Xiao Zhan et al. (2026). The Governance of Intimacy: A Preliminary Policy Analysis of Romantic AI Platforms. arXiv (King's College London-affiliated author team). https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22000
Related Insights
What's on Your Mind? Exploring Privacy of Mental Health Apps
arXiv (University of California, Irvine / University of California, Riverside) · 3 May 2026
The spread of AI companions and the challenges they generate
European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), European Parliament · 19 May 2026