The fall and rise of Iruda: Reassembling AI through ethics-in-action
Peer-reviewed case study of South Korea's Iruda (Lee Luda) chatbot — its 2021 sexual-harassment, hate-speech, and data-consent controversy and its 2022 relaunch. Argues the harms arose from developer/user/algorithm/data assemblages and that practical 'ethics-in-action' interventions enabled a safer relaunch.
Publisher
Social Studies of Science (SAGE)
Published
3 Aug 2025
Added
today
Key Findings
- Reconstructs the 2021 Iruda crisis: gendered sexual harassment, hate speech, and training-data consent failures
- Frames harms as arising from socio-technical assemblages rather than a single fault
- Documents concrete conversational-safety controls (human crisis oversight, content filtering) added for the safer relaunch
Methodology Notes
Peer-reviewed, Social Studies of Science 56(1):53-74 (online 3 August 2025), DOI 10.1177/03063127251360397. Qualitative STS case study; open PMC copy available (PMC12882987).
Sources
Social Studies of Science article (primary)
Archived snapshot (Wayback Machine) — preserved against link rot
Authors
Yubeen Kwon, Sungook Hong
Tags
Cite This
APA
Yubeen Kwon, Sungook Hong (2025). The fall and rise of Iruda: Reassembling AI through ethics-in-action. Social Studies of Science (SAGE). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03063127251360397
Related Insights
Too human and not human enough: A grounded theory analysis of mental health harms from emotional dependence on the social chatbot Replika
New Media & Society (SAGE) · 22 Dec 2022
Pathways of long-term AI virtual companion app use on users' attachment emotions: a case study of Chinese users
Frontiers in Psychology · 12 Jan 2026