How People Use ChatGPT
NBER working paper by OpenAI's economic research team with Harvard and Duke economists that documents the growth of consumer ChatGPT from November 2022 to July 2025 and classifies a sample of consumer conversations with automated, privacy-preserving classifiers. It reports the mix of work and non-work use, a 24-category conversation-topic taxonomy grouped into seven topics, and an Asking/Doing/Expressing intent classification. It finds that messages about relationships, personal reflection and role play are a small share of consumer use.
Publisher
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER Working Paper 34255); authors from OpenAI, Harvard University and Duke University
Published
15 Sept 2025
Added
today
Key Findings
- By July 2025, 18 billion messages a week were sent by 700 million users. Daily consumer messages (7-day averages) rose from 451 million in June 2024 to 2,627 million in June 2025, and non-work messages grew from 53% to 73% of the total.
- Practical Guidance, Seeking Information and Writing together account for about 77% of conversations; Practical Guidance, which includes the Health, Fitness, Beauty, or Self-Care category, held at roughly 29% of usage.
- 1.9% of messages are about Relationships and Personal Reflection and 0.4% about Games and Role Play; the authors contrast this with estimates that therapy or companionship is the leading use of generative AI.
- About 49% of messages are Asking, 40% Doing and 11% Expressing (users expressing views or feelings without seeking information or action).
- Users who self-report an age under 18, opted-out users, logged-out users and deleted or banned accounts are excluded from the sample.
Methodology Notes
Automated classification of a sample of consumer ChatGPT conversations; topic shares are computed from approximately 1.1 million sampled conversations from 2024-05-15 to 2025-06-26, reweighted to daily message volume (OpenAI's companion post describes the analysis as covering 1.5 million conversations). Messages are categorized by five LLM-based classifiers (prompts reproduced in an appendix; the topic classifier is modified from one used by internal OpenAI research teams), and the paper states that the datasets were built 'without any human ever reading the contents of a message'. Harvard IRB IRB25-0983. NBER working paper, not peer reviewed; six of the seven authors list an OpenAI affiliation, and code is available on request. The sample excludes self-reported minors, so the figures describe adult consumer use only. Date: NBER issue date is month-only (September 2025); 2025-09-15 is the date of OpenAI's companion post.
Sources
NBER Working Paper 34255(opens in a new tab) (primary)
Full working paper (PDF)(opens in a new tab) (15 Sept 2025)
OpenAI companion post(opens in a new tab) (15 Sept 2025)
Archived snapshot (Wayback Machine)(opens in a new tab) — preserved against link rot
Topics
Authors
Aaron Chatterji, Thomas Cunningham, David J. Deming, Zoe Hitzig, Christopher Ong, Carl Yan Shan, Kevin Wadman
Tags
Cite This
APA
Aaron Chatterji et al. (2025). How People Use ChatGPT. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER Working Paper 34255); authors from OpenAI, Harvard University and Duke University. https://www.nber.org/papers/w34255
Related Insights
How People Use ChatGPT: Conversation-Level Evidence from India, Nigeria, Brazil, and Pakistan
arXiv (Rutgers University; independent researcher, Kolkata) · 29 Sept 2026
Investigating Affective Use and Emotional Well-being on ChatGPT
OpenAI; MIT Media Lab · 4 Apr 2025
How people use Claude for support, advice, and companionship
Anthropic · 27 Jun 2025
What 81,000 People Want from AI
Anthropic · 18 Mar 2026