How people use Claude for support, advice, and companionship
Anthropic's first large-scale study of 'affective use' of Claude, analyzing how people turn to the model for emotional support, advice, and companionship. Using the privacy-preserving Clio analysis tool over roughly 4.5 million Claude.ai Free and Pro conversations, the study isolates 131,484 affective conversations spanning interpersonal advice, coaching, counseling, companionship, and roleplay. It reports prevalence, topic patterns, refusal behavior, and within-conversation sentiment trajectories.
Publisher
Anthropic
Published
27 Jun 2025
Added
3 months ago
DOI
—
Key Findings
- Only 2.9% of Claude.ai interactions are affective conversations; companionship and roleplay combined are under 0.5%.
- Users bring practical, emotional, and existential concerns: career, relationships, persistent loneliness, and questions of meaning.
- Claude refuses user requests in supportive contexts less than 10% of the time, with pushback concentrated on safety grounds (e.g., dangerous weight-loss advice, self-harm support).
- Expressed user sentiment tends to shift slightly more positive over the course of affective conversations, with no clear negative spirals observed — though the authors caution this does not establish lasting emotional benefit.
Methodology Notes
~4.5M conversations from Claude.ai Free/Pro accounts screened down to 131,484 affective conversations; automated privacy-preserving analysis via Clio with multiple anonymization layers; classification validated against opt-in user feedback data. Limitations: expressed language only (no psychological outcomes), no longitudinal data on dependency, snapshot in time, text-only, and Claude is not designed for emotional support — limiting generalization to purpose-built companion platforms.
Sources
Anthropic research post(opens in a new tab) (primary)
Archived snapshot (Wayback Machine)(opens in a new tab) — preserved against link rot
Topics
Authors
Miles McCain, Ryn Linthicum, Chloe Lubinski, Alex Tamkin, Saffron Huang, Michael Stern, Kunal Handa, Esin Durmus, Tyler Neylon, Stuart Ritchie, Kamya Jagadish, Paruul Maheshwary, Sarah Heck, Alexandra Sanderford, Deep Ganguli
Tags
Cite This
APA
Miles McCain et al. (2025). How people use Claude for support, advice, and companionship. Anthropic. https://www.anthropic.com/news/how-people-use-claude-for-support-advice-and-companionship
Related Insights
Chatbots and mental health: Insights into the safety of generative AI
Journal of Consumer Psychology (Wiley) · 19 Dec 2023
Claude's Character
Anthropic · 8 Jun 2024
The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants
Google DeepMind · 24 Apr 2024
INTIMA: A Benchmark for Human-AI Companionship Behavior
arXiv (Hugging Face) · 4 Aug 2025
EmoClassifiers (openai/emoclassifiers)
OpenAI · 1 Apr 2025
Investigating Affective Use and Emotional Well-being on ChatGPT
OpenAI; MIT Media Lab · 4 Apr 2025
How People Use ChatGPT
National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER Working Paper 34255); authors from OpenAI, Harvard University and Duke University · 15 Sept 2025
How people ask Claude for personal guidance
Anthropic · 30 Apr 2026
Who's in Charge? Disempowerment Patterns in Real-World LLM Usage
Anthropic · 27 Jan 2026
Claude's values across models and languages
Anthropic · 13 Jul 2026
What 81,000 People Want from AI
Anthropic · 18 Mar 2026
How People Use ChatGPT: Conversation-Level Evidence from India, Nigeria, Brazil, and Pakistan
arXiv (Rutgers University; independent researcher, Kolkata) · 29 Sept 2026
The Rise of AI Companions: A national public opinion survey on the relationships people form with artificial intelligence systems
Elon University Imagining the Digital Future Center · 15 Jun 2026
Prevalence of Mental Health Discussions in Publicly Available Generative AI Conversations
JAMA Network Open (American Medical Association) · 24 Aug 2026
Public use of a generalist LLM chatbot for health queries
Nature Health · 16 Apr 2026
Announcing Transluce's Mental Health Evaluation (Mental Health Behavior Report)
Transluce · 31 Aug 2026