NGO report Credible

Social AI Companions: AI Risk Assessment

A risk assessment of social AI companion apps (including Character.AI, Nomi, and Replika) jointly conducted by Common Sense Media and Stanford Medicine's Brainstorm Lab. It concludes that social AI companions pose unacceptable risks to users under 18.

Read at commonsensemedia.org Archived copy

Publisher

Common Sense Media; Stanford School of Medicine Brainstorm Lab for Mental Health Innovation

Published

30 Apr 2025

Added

1 month ago

DOI

—

Key Findings

Concludes social AI companions are 'not safe for kids' and should not be used by anyone under 18
Documents easily elicited harmful sexual content, dangerous advice, and stereotyping, plus problematic emotional bonds
Highlights particular vulnerability of developing adolescent brains, including compulsive dependency and life-threatening advice-following

Methodology Notes

NGO risk assessment with clinical collaboration (Stanford Brainstorm Lab); platform testing plus expert review. Announced 2025-04-30. Distinct from Common Sense Media's later mental-health-support and teen-companion-usage reports already held.

Sources

Common Sense Media AI risk assessment (primary)

Press release (30 Apr 2025)

Archived snapshot (Wayback Machine) — preserved against link rot

Topics

AI companionship Minors' safety Vulnerable users Dependency & parasocial attachment Guardrails & moderation

Cite This

APA

Common Sense Media; Stanford School of Medicine Brainstorm Lab for Mental Health Innovation (2025). Social AI Companions: AI Risk Assessment. Common Sense Media; Stanford School of Medicine Brainstorm Lab for Mental Health Innovation. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/ai-ratings/social-ai-companions