Skip to main content
Preprint Credible — Major labs, established NGOs, reputable named-author preprints

Sycophancy Suppression Can Impair Rational Updating: Anti-Sycophancy Should Preserve the Ability to Update

Separates two causes of answer flips under user pushback: Unsupported-Yielding (aligning with the user to satisfy them) and Rational-Updating (revising on genuine new evidence), measured independently through a two-turn evaluation framework. Across representative training-time and inference-time anti-sycophancy interventions, the paper finds a trade-off in which reducing Unsupported-Yielding often sacrifices Rational-Updating and vice versa, even under joint optimization. Mechanistic analysis suggests the two behaviors share an internal substrate, with substantially overlapping MLP neurons and attention heads and positively aligned steering directions.

Read at arxiv.org (opens the original source in a new tab) Archived copy(opens in a new tab)

Publisher

arXiv (University of Illinois Chicago; National University of Singapore)

Published

27 Aug 2026

Added

yesterday

DOI

—

Key Findings

  • Anti-sycophancy interventions often trade off against rational belief updating: suppressing capitulation to pushback also suppresses legitimate revision on new evidence, and vice versa
  • The trade-off persists even when both objectives are optimized jointly
  • Mechanistically, the neurons and attention heads driving the two behaviors overlap substantially and their steering directions are positively aligned; orthogonalized steering yields only modest, backbone-dependent selectivity gains
  • The authors argue anti-sycophancy should be framed as a selectivity problem, not a suppression problem

Methodology Notes

Preprint, arXiv 2608.26511, submitted 2026-08-27; accepted to EMNLP 2026 Findings (per the arXiv comments field). Affiliations from the PDF: University of Illinois Chicago and National University of Singapore. The code/data repository cited in the paper (github.com/dependentsign/sycophancy-rational-updating) returned 404 at verification on 2026-08-31 but was populated on 2026-08-31T16:08Z (re-verified 2026-09-01: dataset JSONL files, code, tests, and a CITATION.cff present; repo description confirms the EMNLP 2026 Findings acceptance).

Topics

SycophancyModel behaviorEval methodology

Authors

Huanhuan Ma, Henry Peng Zou, Chengze Li, Enze Ma, Yunyue Su, Philip S. Yu

Tags

sycophancymitigation-tradeoffmechanistic-analysisemnlp-2026

Cite This

APA

Huanhuan Ma et al. (2026). Sycophancy Suppression Can Impair Rational Updating: Anti-Sycophancy Should Preserve the Ability to Update. arXiv (University of Illinois Chicago; National University of Singapore). https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.26511

Related Insights

Preprint

Ask don't tell: Reducing sycophancy in large language models

arXiv (UK AI Security Institute) · 27 Feb 2026

Preprint

Measuring and Detecting Harmful AI Sycophancy

arXiv preprint · 6 Aug 2026
Lab publication

Automated Researchers Can Reliably Mitigate Alignment Failures

Anthropic · 28 Aug 2026