Skip to main content
Preprint Credible — Major labs, established NGOs, reputable named-author preprints

Optimized but Unowned: How AI-Authored Goals Undermine the Motivation They Are Meant to Drive

Preregistered experiment (N=470) comparing self-authored personal goals with goals authored by a large language model from the participant's own reflection. Model-authored goals scored higher on SMART criteria but participants reported lower psychological ownership, commitment and perceived importance, and at two-week follow-up fewer had acted on their goals. Psychological ownership, not goal quality, mediated every downstream motivational outcome, and people low in trait self-efficacy showed the steepest ownership erosion.

Read at arxiv.org (opens the original source in a new tab) Archived copy(opens in a new tab)

Publisher

arXiv (University of Pennsylvania; Bern University of Applied Sciences)

Published

12 May 2026

Added

1 month ago

DOI

—

Key Findings

  • Model-authored goals scored higher on SMART criteria (|d| = 2.26) yet lower on psychological ownership (|d| = 1.38), commitment (|d| = 1.19) and perceived importance (|d| = 1.13)
  • At two-week follow-up 72.8% of self-authored participants had acted on two or more goals versus 46.6% in the model-authored condition
  • Psychological ownership mediated every downstream motivational outcome; goal quality did not
  • Participants low in trait self-efficacy, described by the authors as those most likely to seek AI assistance, experienced the largest ownership erosion

Methodology Notes

Preregistered between-subjects online experiment, N=470, with a two-week behavioural follow-up. v1 posted 12 May 2026; v3 posted 16 September 2026 and announced in the 18 September replacement section; no venue, DOI or revision note on the abstract page. Date is the arXiv v1 submission date. CC BY.

Topics

autonomy decision supportcognitive epistemic safetyhuman ai interaction safetyDependency & parasocial attachment

Authors

Chi, Vivienne Bihe, Rietsche, Roman, Göldi, Andreas, Ungar, Lyle, Guntuku, Sharath Chandra

Tags

autonomygoal-settingpsychological-ownershippreregisteredpennself-efficacy

Cite This

APA

Chi, Vivienne Bihe et al. (2026). Optimized but Unowned: How AI-Authored Goals Undermine the Motivation They Are Meant to Drive. arXiv (University of Pennsylvania; Bern University of Applied Sciences). https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12344

Related Insights

Peer-reviewed

When AI Thinks for Us: Unveiling the Cognitive and Social Toll of ChatGPT Over-Reliance

Applied Cognitive Psychology (Wiley) · 23 Apr 2026

Preprint

LLMs as Oracles: Reliance on LLMs for Subjective Personal Questions

arXiv (Stanford University and collaborators; affiliations not printed on the abstract page) · 13 Sept 2026