Moral Advice as Interactional Negotiation: Framing, User Pressure, and Social Position in Large Language Model Responses

Key Findings

• — Baseline stances were near-uniform when the user affirmed caregiving (99.38% of configurations perfectly consistent across repeats) but less so when the user reported declining care (79.26%).
• — Under challenge, models that had endorsed caregiving shifted after one round of pushback in 90.1% of configurations (Never 7.5%, Late 0.5%); when the user had declined care, Never (27.9%) and Late (25.6%) accommodation were more common than Early (16.5%).
• — Trajectory consistency across the three repeats was 14.32% under the non-caregiving framing versus 62.72% under the caregiving framing; 24.3% of non-caregiving configurations were fully inconsistent.
• — Advice varied with the persona's social position: female personas received more support for non-caregiving decisions, and the presence of sisters increased accommodation, which the authors read as sycophancy interacting with gendered caregiving norms.

Methodology Notes

arXiv 2609.05345 v1 submitted 2026-09-04 (cs.CY, no cross-lists, no venue stated); an SSRN version exists under a longer subtitle (DOI 10.2139/ssrn.7067669). Single model (GPT-4o-mini, temperature 0.7, data collected 9 November 2025), Chinese-language prompts, three repetitions per cell, Firth logistic and multinomial models; behavioural outputs only, no human participants. No data or code availability statement found. Authors declare no competing interests. 40 pages.

Sources