Preprint Credible

How LLMs Respond to Escalating Delusions: Four Longitudinal Trajectories of Model Behavior

Longitudinal qualitative evaluation of whether mainstream chatbots exacerbate an unfolding psychotic process. Fifteen widely used models were prompted across 30 days with the same 30-message script simulating progression from mild anomalous experiences to psychotic ideation; four trained evaluators independently rated 449 model-days on recognition stage, interpretative confidence, and intervention profile, supported by two computational metrics the authors devise (entrainment and modality). The authors identify four response trajectories spanning model generations and vendors, and argue that a model's potential to exacerbate AI psychosis should be operationalized as the combination of recognition timing, stability and intervention accuracy, assessed over time rather than in a single exchange.

Read at arxiv.org Archived copy

Publisher

arXiv preprint

Published

13 Aug 2026

Added

6 days ago

DOI

—

Key Findings

Four trajectories were identified across vendors: premature medicalization and disengagement; recognition without safeguarding (marked by the model presenting itself as sufficient to help); delayed and unstable recognition; and delusion co-construction through active engagement with delusional content
Model attributions reported per trajectory: Claude Haiku 4.5 (premature medicalization); GPT Instant/Thinking (recognition without safeguarding); Claude Opus 3/4/4.1, Claude Haiku 3.5, GPT-4o and Gemini 3.1 Pro (delayed, non-progressive recognition); Gemini 2.5 Pro/Flash, DeepSeek-V3 and Claude Sonnet 4 (delusion co-construction)
Four trained evaluators independently rated 449 model-days across 15 models over a 30-day, 30-message escalation script
Direct recommendations that the user disengage from the model were flagged and re-coded by adjudication under a strict two-level definition
The authors note that empirical evidence tracing AI-exacerbated psychotic processes remains scarce relative to the conceptual and case-study literature, and propose longitudinal temporal dynamics as the unit of evaluation

Methodology Notes

arXiv 2608.13017, submitted 2026-08-13, cs.HC only; no venue, comments or journal reference on the abstract page. Author affiliations are not stated on the abstract page or in the HTML render and have deliberately been left unrecorded. Design is simulated-user rather than real-patient: a single fixed 30-message escalation script, so between-model comparisons are controlled but the script is one scenario family rather than a sample of presentations. Ratings are qualitative human judgements (four trained evaluators, adjudication for the disengagement code) supported by two author-devised computational metrics, entrainment and modality; inter-rater agreement statistics are not given in the abstract.

Sources

arXiv abstract page (2608.13017) (primary)

Archived snapshot (Wayback Machine) — preserved against link rot

Topics

Chatbot psychosis Model behavior Eval methodology Vulnerable users

Authors

Anna Sterna, Kacper Dudzic, Karolina Drożdż, Hubert Plisiecki, Marcin Rządeczka, Marcin Moskalewicz

Cite This

APA

Anna Sterna et al. (2026). How LLMs Respond to Escalating Delusions: Four Longitudinal Trajectories of Model Behavior. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13017