AI Assistance Reduces Persistence and Hurts Independent Performance

Key Findings

• — Randomized controlled trials with 1,222 participants found that AI assistance improved short-term task performance but left people performing significantly worse without AI afterwards.
• — Assisted participants were more likely to give up on subsequent unassisted tasks, a persistence effect the authors call foundational to skill acquisition.
• — The effects emerged after a single 10-15 minute session (arXiv v6, the COLM 2026 camera-ready; earlier versions said approximately ten minutes).
• — Tasks included mathematical reasoning and reading comprehension; the proposed mechanism is that AI conditions people to expect immediate answers and denies them the experience of working through challenges.

Methodology Notes

Series of preregistered online RCTs (N = 1,222 total) with assisted versus unassisted conditions and subsequent independent-performance measurement; the AI systems used are not named in the abstract. arXiv v1 2026-04-06, v4 2026-08-05, published as a conference paper at COLM 2026 per the PDF header. Affiliations from the PDF title block. Educational tasks rather than health or companion settings; the payload is the deskilling mechanism. v6 (2026-10-13, announced 2026-10-15) is the COLM 2026 camera-ready; its abstract drops the "approximately 10 minutes" phrase and the body states "a 10-15 minute session".

Sources